Best Education Theory in 2022


Types of Education Theory

There are many types of Education Theory, from Naturalistic to Social learning. Here are a few of the most prominent types: Cognitive constructivist learning theory, Social learning theory, and Experiential learning theory. Let's look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of each theory. The key is to choose the theory that best suits your needs. Learning theories are the foundation of educational practice and should be well-defined and explained. If you're not sure what they are, read the following articles.

Naturalistic Education Theory

The term NET stands for "naturalistic education theory," which has many variations. Among them, this theory of education has been used by many educators to describe the philosophy of nature-based education. Depending on the source, this theory can be abbreviated as NET, NEAT, or NET. The NET image can be downloaded and printed, or sent to friends via email or social media. Learn more about the philosophy behind the term NET.

According to the naturalists, nature is the ultimate teacher. In their view, children develop their minds and bodies most naturally when they are surrounded by nature. Ultimately, teachers should not interfere with a child's natural development. Instead, they should provide an environment that fosters growth and self-expression. In addition, naturalistic education theory emphasizes the importance of training the senses. The natural world, and the world, are the best way for a child to learn.

The naturalistic education theory claims that a child's development takes place in his or her environment, rather than the artificial atmosphere of a school. "Nature" has two meanings in naturalist education theory: nature and the child's nature. The natural environment is a complete and holistic approach to education, and it is important to remember that human nature is not static. It needs to be dynamic to encourage growth and development.

Social learning theory

A key component of the theory is the concept of social learning. This theory holds that people learn by imitating behavior in their environment. For example, a child may imitate the behavior of a parent who volunteers or performs household tasks. These behaviors become reinforced as a result. In other words, social learning theory explains why children learn by imitating their parents. This theory is flexible, allowing it to be applied to many different situations.

In a recent study, North-West University researchers explored the role of social learning tools in urban and regional planning education. During the process of designing the learning module, they observed how students from Generation Z perceived social learning tools. The study included a third-year module on "Sustainable Cities" in the department's Urban and Regional Planning program. This module was chosen according to the educators' own experiences with social learning tools, and longitudinal data was collected from 139 students.

While social learning theory offers a different perspective on the way children learn, it is also susceptible to criticism. For one thing, it overlooks important factors such as nature and social context. Moreover, it ignores the role of individual accountability and the influence of biological factors. For instance, biological theorists argue that certain behaviors are partly inherited and are therefore learned. Hence, it is impossible to describe every behavior with complete confidence without a role model.

Experiential learning theory

The Experiential Learning Theory of education describes how students learn best by having an experience, rather than by reading or studying information. Such experiences stick in the student's memory, allowing them to retain information and facts better than when they only hear or read them. Teachers must design learning activities that encourage students to engage in such experiences. The following are examples of learning activities based on the Experiential Learning Theory of education:

First, students engage in concrete experience. This may include a new experience or interpreting a prior experience in a different way. The next step in the learning process is abstract conceptualization, where learners develop new ideas or adjust their thinking. Finally, they apply what they've learned to the real world, either over a short period of time or over a long period of time. Experiential learning theory in education theory comes with an important caveat, however: experiential learning must be accompanied by a concrete experience.

The Experiential Learning Theory was first proposed by psychologist David A. Kolb, and later influenced by John Dewey, Kurt Lewin, Jean Piaget, and others. The theory focuses on the importance of experience in learning, and recognizes the role of mental processes in learning. This is particularly important because people learn through experience in all situations and are continually developing new theories of the world. The Experiential Learning Theory provides an ideal framework for educational practices, which is important for both employers and students alike.

Cognitive constructivist learning theory

The cognitive constructivist learning theory in education focuses on the importance of learning. Unlike other theories, this one focuses on the learning process as a process of construction and discovery. This approach shifts the focus of learning from the teacher to the students. The theory also considers the diversity of learning experiences that students bring to class. In contrast, learning theories that emphasize the importance of teachers play an important role.

Piaget is often considered the creator of this theory, but other important contributors include Dewey, Bruner, and Vygotsky. The constructivist approach has its roots in Piaget's work, which described the developing child as a lone scientist exploring his or her environment and drawing conclusions about the world. Social constructivism adds a social dimension to constructivist theory, focusing on the social aspects of learning.

A key difference between the two is the importance of social aspects of cognitive constructivism in education. In contrast to the traditional approach to learning, which emphasizes imparting knowledge, constructivism asserts that learning is a social process. As such, knowledge cannot be transmitted directly. Rather, the goal of teaching is to provide experiences that help students construct knowledge. Traditional approaches to teaching emphasize the delivery of information to students, but the purpose of a cognitive constructivist learning theory is to help students build knowledge by fostering their own experiences.

Extrinsic rewards

Both teachers and parents would like students to be motivated by intrinsic motivation. However, many students must first experience extrinsic motivation to develop the habit of learning for its own sake. Extrinsic rewards are motivated by the desire to please others. Ultimately, both types of motivation can lead to successful learning. Both methods may be useful in certain situations, but they are not always equivalent. Teachers and parents should consider how each method affects students.

In order to effectively motivate students, extrinsic rewards need to be large enough to encourage them to perform well. However, they shouldn't be so large that they aren't genuinely interested in doing a good task. Instead, reward good work with small extrinsic rewards, such as stickers and candy. This technique will encourage students to work hard and become productive members of society, but should not be used as a substitute for intrinsic rewards.

Moreover, while the Premack Principle is useful for teaching children, it does not work well for older students. Children who learn in an environment where adults are more influential than children are not prone to self-regulation, and thereby lack maturity, may not be motivated enough to perform well. Extrinsic rewards in education theory

Coherence principle

The Coherence Principle in education theory states that all text, graphics, and sound must directly support the objectives of the educational process. This principle is based on the belief that adding additional text and illustrations interferes with cognitive processing and distracts from learning. Thus, teachers should make conscious and reflective decisions when implementing new instructional strategies. In addition to fostering the growth of critical and reflective thinking skills, the Coherence Principle also demands that all teaching and learning materials are visually appealing.

This principle can be used with other learning models and principles to foster better learning habits. Examples of such models and principles include the chunking principle and the visual and auditory split effects. In your next classroom lesson, ask your students to describe successful and unsuccessful ways to apply the Coherence Principle to the content of the presentation. In PowerPoint-based trainings, for example, have them identify instances where the Coherence Principle has been violated.

The Coherence Principle points to the importance of coherent action as a key component of belief transfer. Without action, beliefs cannot become credible and transfer to students. Instead, educators must act in a manner that is in line with their beliefs in order to build a stronger foundation for teaching. And this is one of the biggest challenges of education today. So, what are the best strategies to use the Coherence Principle in Education Theory?


Lee Bennett

Hardworking, reliable sales/account manager, been involved in the Telecoms/Technology sector for around 10 years. Extensive knowledge of MPLS, SDWAN, Wi-Fi, PCI Compliance, e-sim, Internet Connectivity, Mobile, VOIP, Full stack Software Development.

📧Email | 📘LinkedIn